|
Post by beaugates on May 7, 2012 15:48:18 GMT -8
Are the settings the same as last year for the playoffs? Now that there is less teams it would seem silly to have 8 of 12 make the playoffs. Thanks for any info.
|
|
|
Post by #31 Mr. ShutdownCb on May 7, 2012 15:57:36 GMT -8
Would be nice if they had a 4 team or 6 team playoff but unfortunately as I assume they'll keep it at 8 but who knows sometimes them #4 seeds shock folks.
Damn Buzzards!!!
|
|
|
Post by jdisney on May 7, 2012 16:05:52 GMT -8
Beau it is staying the same. It was brought up to make it 6 teams instead of 8 with the top team from each Division getting a bye. However that was voted down.
|
|
|
Post by America on May 7, 2012 19:53:29 GMT -8
Have the top 2 AA teams from the WWFA enter the PFL playoffs to make it a 8 team championship tournament.
|
|
|
Post by MAVERICK32 on May 7, 2012 20:31:21 GMT -8
If they are not in the PFL, they are not going to be in the PFL playoffs. If they want to be in the PFL playoffs, next year they need to quit playing around and join the PFL. Show what they got got during the season and make the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by America on May 8, 2012 4:22:28 GMT -8
If they are not in the PFL, they are not going to be in the PFL playoffs. If they want to be in the PFL playoffs, next year they need to quit playing around and join the PFL. Show what they got got during the season and make the playoffs. The problem is the WWFA will not join the PFL because of swelled up macho pride from both league leaders. The names WWFA and PFL will have to disband and come together under a different league name acceptable to all teams with leaders of both leagues holding key league jobs. The Public doesn't know what a PFL or WWFA is anyway so its ok to change a league name. Make it happen next season.
|
|
|
Post by markmeadows on May 8, 2012 4:55:21 GMT -8
If they are not in the PFL, they are not going to be in the PFL playoffs. If they want to be in the PFL playoffs, next year they need to quit playing around and join the PFL. Show what they got got during the season and make the playoffs. The problem is the WWFA will not join the PFL because of swelled up macho pride from both league leaders. The names WWFA and PFL will have to disband and come together under a different league name acceptable to all teams with leaders of both leagues holding key league jobs. The Public doesn't know what a PFL or WWFA is anyway so its ok to change a league name. Make it happen next season. Nobody in the PFL is interested in the WWFA bottom feeders. in non-league action they were 0-8 including the #2 team getting beat by the buzzards. The Stallions are the only decent team there that could compete.
|
|
|
Post by toro on May 8, 2012 5:43:40 GMT -8
Buzzards beat what everybody thought was the #1 team LAST season...
|
|
|
Post by markmeadows on May 8, 2012 9:25:54 GMT -8
Buzzards beat what everybody thought was the #1 team LAST season... and? should the NFL merge with the CFL simply because the Grey Cup winner could beat last years Colts team? It would make the NFL weaker as a whole. same is true of a WWFA merger into the PFL. if teams think they can compete with the PFL teams, they will make the move. If not, they will keep playing where they are. food for thought, since 2008 the current members of the WWFA are 4-17 when playing current PFL/WFL or Independent teams of the northwest. that's not a winning percentage that deserves any talk of merging that benefits the PFL membership in any way.
|
|
|
Post by #31 Mr. ShutdownCb on May 8, 2012 9:44:24 GMT -8
Buzzards beat what everybody thought was the #1 team LAST season... Why you got go there on me bro?? Cut me deep...haha
|
|
|
Post by #31 Mr. ShutdownCb on May 8, 2012 9:45:43 GMT -8
Buzzards beat what everybody thought was the #1 team LAST season... and? should the NFL merge with the CFL simply because the Grey Cup winner could beat last years Colts team? It would make the NFL weaker as a whole. same is true of a WWFA merger into the PFL. if teams think they can compete with the PFL teams, they will make the move. If not, they will keep playing where they are. food for thought, since 2008 the current members of the WWFA are 4-17 when playing current PFL/WFL or Independent teams of the northwest. that's not a winning percentage that deserves any talk of merging that benefits the PFL membership in any way. Before any kind of merger could happen they would have to do some serious team mergers...clowns always want to do it better than everyone else.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 8, 2012 10:56:57 GMT -8
Where in the hell are you getting your stats from? The Stallions have beaten the Colts, Vikings, Cavs, Bengals for a total of a minimum of 8 wins since 2008 alone!
|
|
|
Post by G27 on May 8, 2012 11:01:02 GMT -8
Where in the hell are you getting your stats from? The Stallions have beaten the Colts, Vikings, Cavs, Bengals for a total of a minimum of 8 wins since 2008 alone! You might want to re-read his post again
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 8, 2012 11:14:03 GMT -8
Nothing to re-read. The Colts and Vikings are current members of the PFL, and the Bengals and Cavs are independent..........The Stallions are current WWFA, what part of that dont you understand?
|
|
|
Post by ghbc50 on May 8, 2012 12:05:36 GMT -8
Doc,
I believe he is referring the post above the one you quoted, where he clearly stated that the Stallions were the only team that could compete...
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using ProBoards
|
|