|
Post by mavericks2thebull on Jun 14, 2011 10:23:01 GMT -8
Uncle rico had a sick arm . U show me one guy who can spin it like him and i'll show u a champion . As far as the bulldogs. Since 08' they had one good year . But did they play anyone that was tough . Bdog12 didnt u play #! For them in 08' maybe not , his number was 12 . Just wondering .
|
|
|
Post by mavericks2thebull on Jun 14, 2011 10:23:29 GMT -8
Qb
|
|
|
Post by bdog12 on Jun 14, 2011 10:44:23 GMT -8
Russ, fair enough i take that back, i shouldnt have said that......i shouldnt discredit a team that can back up the same stats up that we have......if u guys run the table and win it then u would have earned it the same way we wouldve if we came back so i apologize. you are abviously confident in your teams ability as i am with mine, so we could argue about that till we're blue in the face so whats the point. as for ur retiring statement........i can only speak for myself, being that next month im gonna be 31 w 2 kids.....life moves on after all this is just semipro fball (especially since i broke my L fibula playin stupid flag fball 6 weeks ago so im done for good lol)......i doubt there will be a "next year" for us (the 2010 squad) hopefully the dogs can sort it out and get better tho.
|
|
|
Post by bdog12 on Jun 14, 2011 10:51:31 GMT -8
maverick2 - no i didnt play for dogs in 08 i was on the bc spartans, as for dogs having 1 good year? ? 2009 we went undefeated in reg season and hosted the nafl champion st. paul pioneers and lost by 5 points.
|
|
|
Post by mavericks2thebull on Jun 14, 2011 11:08:49 GMT -8
Oh , okay good job .
|
|
|
Post by keepitreal on Jun 14, 2011 12:50:34 GMT -8
this is my opinion and my opinion alone.yes i know im not playin this year and have retired much like most of the rest of my teammates from 2010 but c'mon........any player or coach that played us in the northwest last year KNOWS that if the bulldogs had returned in full we wouldve wrecked shop on the PFL, every single team including the monarchs (2010 monarchs, who knows bout that, they had some guys retire too, wish we played)........i look at it this way.....2010 dogs would DESTROY the 2011 dogs like 70 or 80 nothing (sorry guys, thats the truth) so im using them as a measuring stick to all the games the 2011 dogs games that they win and lose this year.....the only game that was close for us last year was our trip to medford.....we played pretty poorly that day (like 7 turnovers...2 fumbles on the goal line.....left alot of points on the field that day).........yeah we lost to nashville in the chip (so u can save that reply) call it what u want it doesnt matter, in the NW championship we put up 59 on the bears (they scored late on us when the game was out of reach)......semi final we smoked the bay area pearland gamblers 42-7 (they had their full squad too, their head coach said so).........so to whoever wins the PFL this year be thankful we're not around to spoil ur party....u can take ur consolation prize......dont be upset bout this.....just ask anyone that played us last year and they'll tel u the same Just when KeepItReal was heading off for vacation someone had to write something idiotic and reel me back in. Looks like someone has a bad case of the "what ifs," mixed with a heavy dose of "coulda woulda," topped with a heaping helping of "wishful thinking." Seriously, was there not one part of you strong enough to control you from posting this ridiculous rant? Just a twinge of common sense, someplace within you to say "stop. don't make a fool of yourself?" Telling an entire league they are lucky that you and your boys retired, blah, blah, blah??? Are you insane? What on earth makes the 2010 Bulldogs any better than any other championship team? I'm looking in the GNFA record books and, uhm, nope, don't see very many entries for the greatest team in recent times, the 2010 Bulldogs. www.gnfafootball.org/records.htmWait, maybe I missed the news flash but do the Bulldogs have the market cornered on losing quality players year-to-year while all other teams remain the same? Maybe I missed that. Someone alert me if I did. Every team loses players for a variety of reasons. You are not unique. But the fact that 20 guys leaving turned a so-called dominant team of destruction into a 1-7 club makes me believe you lacked the depth to handle a team like the Monarchs, who reload like Clint Eastwood in a Dirty Harry movie. Ridiculous!!! But hey, nothing wrong with having a rich fantasy life in retirement.
|
|
|
Post by America on Jun 14, 2011 14:04:47 GMT -8
I can't argue with that. It's hard to imagine any one team raiding the rest of the league like the Jets did, and it's hard to imagine anyone getting grown men to kiss his behind with such loyalty as Kenny Austin did. ;D You can do anything with cash.
|
|
|
Post by #31 Mr. ShutdownCb on Jun 14, 2011 14:19:23 GMT -8
Being good in your region don't mean shit! Win it all then you can have bragging rights. This goes for all of us!
|
|
|
Post by bdog12 on Jun 14, 2011 15:40:29 GMT -8
keepitreal - oohhh ur so witty and articulate arent u?? uuummmm did u not read my post directed at russ shneider, the monarchs STARTING quarterback?? lol...also i guess they do have a monopoly on the market of losing quality players.....u know what ur absolutely right.....losing 20 starters PLUS almost every single reserve leaving the bulldogs with a completely different team the next year does show we lacked depth, damn why didnt i think of that myself? thank you for the insight. shutdowncb - i hear ya...although since neither of us were able to do that coupled with the fact there is not a national format anymore, i wanted everyone to know that if the pfl was in play last year.....things woulda been a lil different.
|
|
|
Post by keepitreal on Jun 14, 2011 15:42:09 GMT -8
Being good in your region don't mean shit! Win it all then you can have bragging rights. This goes for all of us! When all of What? Aren't there, like, 10 semi-pro "national title" games. And most, if not all, don't involve a true playoff so how does a team know it "won it all?" If teams can't get to each other to play then there is no such thing as a "national" title. Picking two teams, having them play and calling it such does not make it so. Winning your region, where teams can actually get to one another is far more important than some mythical national title, or 10.
|
|
|
Post by bearcat58 on Jun 14, 2011 15:57:09 GMT -8
2010 bulldogs were one of the best teams I've played against, I was surprised they lost the NAFL National Championship game, I was there and the refs took them out of the game. They gave the momentum to the Storm and a touchdown, along with calling back about 3 scores for the Dogs. Even the local fans and All-star player by the 2nd quarter were all cheering for the Dogs. Due to BS calls and the bush league play of the Storm. Looking at the rankings looks like if the Bears or Monarchs can go undefeated they my face them this year. But as for the Dogs running through the PFL I'm surprised even the Bears are 7-0 in the north but still have 3 more to go. The 2010 bulldogs would have made this year even more exciting.
|
|
|
Post by America on Jun 14, 2011 16:03:36 GMT -8
If teams can't get to each other to play then there is no such thing as a "national" title. Winning your region, where teams can actually get to one another is far more important than some mythical national title, or 10. Yes we still see difficulty bringing teams together locally even in our own region.
|
|
|
Post by coachclark on Jun 14, 2011 16:04:58 GMT -8
this is my opinion and my opinion alone.yes i know im not playin this year and have retired much like most of the rest of my teammates from 2010 but c'mon........any player or coach that played us in the northwest last year KNOWS that if the bulldogs had returned in full we wouldve wrecked shop on the PFL, every single team including the monarchs (2010 monarchs, who knows bout that, they had some guys retire too, wish we played)........i look at it this way.....2010 dogs would DESTROY the 2011 dogs like 70 or 80 nothing (sorry guys, thats the truth) so im using them as a measuring stick to all the games the 2011 dogs games that they win and lose this year.....the only game that was close for us last year was our trip to medford.....we played pretty poorly that day (like 7 turnovers...2 fumbles on the goal line.....left alot of points on the field that day).........yeah we lost to nashville in the chip (so u can save that reply) call it what u want it doesnt matter, in the NW championship we put up 59 on the bears (they scored late on us when the game was out of reach)......semi final we smoked the bay area pearland gamblers 42-7 (they had their full squad too, their head coach said so).........so to whoever wins the PFL this year be thankful we're not around to spoil ur party....u can take ur consolation prize......dont be upset bout this.....just ask anyone that played us last year and they'll tel u the same Just when KeepItReal was heading off for vacation someone had to write something idiotic and reel me back in. Looks like someone has a bad case of the "what ifs," mixed with a heavy dose of "coulda woulda," topped with a heaping helping of "wishful thinking." Seriously, was there not one part of you strong enough to control you from posting this ridiculous rant? Just a twinge of common sense, someplace within you to say "stop. don't make a fool of yourself?" Telling an entire league they are lucky that you and your boys retired, blah, blah, blah??? Are you insane? What on earth makes the 2010 Bulldogs any better than any other championship team? I'm looking in the GNFA record books and, uhm, nope, don't see very many entries for the greatest team in recent times, the 2010 Bulldogs. www.gnfafootball.org/records.htmWait, maybe I missed the news flash but do the Bulldogs have the market cornered on losing quality players year-to-year while all other teams remain the same? Maybe I missed that. Someone alert me if I did. Every team loses players for a variety of reasons. You are not unique. But the fact that 20 guys leaving turned a so-called dominant team of destruction into a 1-7 club makes me believe you lacked the depth to handle a team like the Monarchs, who reload like Clint Eastwood in a Dirty Harry movie. Ridiculous!!! But hey, nothing wrong with having a rich fantasy life in retirement. This has to be Coach Fentress. even does the eye rolling smiley face that hes done in the past. lolol
|
|
|
Post by keepitreal on Jun 14, 2011 17:19:47 GMT -8
keepitreal - oohhh ur so witty and articulate arent u?? uuummmm did u not read my post directed at russ shneider, the monarchs STARTING quarterback?? lol...also i guess they do have a monopoly on the market of losing quality players.....u know what ur absolutely right.....losing 20 starters PLUS almost every single reserve leaving the bulldogs with a completely different team the next year does show we lacked depth, damn why didnt i think of that myself? thank you for the insight. shutdowncb - i hear ya...although since neither of us were able to do that coupled with the fact there is not a national format anymore, i wanted everyone to know that if the pfl was in play last year.....things woulda been a lil different. I saw the 2009 Bulldogs and the Monarchs would have wiped them off the face of the earth. Didn't see 2010 team. But clearly some of their players are so legendary, they win titles without even playing, such as the 2011 PFL title, which you've made clear would rightfully be theirs had they bothered to attend the party. As for your comments to Russell: Maybe you could explain to him how although he has thrown for, like, 220 touchdown passes and 12,000 yards since 2008 the mighty 2010 bulldogs would have made him their bitch. I'd like to hear that one. Sadly, I guess we'll all never know what would have happened since YOU QUIT while the Monarchs are still rolling along. Yes, I said "quit." You guys knew the PFL was coming. You knew the Monarchs would be on the schedule. Yet, you ducked out with your tails between your legs. How do 20 starters quit - excuse me - "retire" at the same time leaving a team high and dry, anyway? That is unheard of. Sounds like a mass exodus of convenience to me. Tell you what, why don't you petition the PFL's brain trust to see if they'll simply anoint you as the 2011 honorary PFL champions since you winning it all would have been a mere formality had you graced the league with your grand presence. Even better, ask the PFL to dub its championship game... "The You're-Lucky-The-2010-Bulldogs-Quit-Cause-They-Would-Have-Owned-The-PFL Bowl." haha Now that's comedy.
|
|
|
Post by keepitreal on Jun 14, 2011 17:27:38 GMT -8
If teams can't get to each other to play then there is no such thing as a "national" title. Winning your region, where teams can actually get to one another is far more important than some mythical national title, or 10. Yes we still see difficulty bringing teams together locally even in our own region. The PFL has changed that. Can anyone honestly pretend there is a better league in the N.W.? People like you were crying to see the Monarchs play the Renegades, Colts and Bulldogs. Well, it happened, all coming in a four-week stretch. Now what?!?!!? Bears-Monarchs or Bearcats-Monarchs would be the last desirable matchup to be seen based on the past few years of semi-pro football. Maybe the Cobras would be contenders in the PFL, but they have chosen a different path so the question is moot. Plus, if they were just another PFL team they probably wouldn't have a lot of the players they seduced with promises of "professional development" as they rolled to Boise with 20 players. LOL The PFL is where it's at. 16 teams. Think about that. 16 teams. The NWFL in its heyday had, what, 12? Plus the PFL has strong leadership and actual bylaws teams must adhere to. Imagine that. Rules to adhere to. Wow. What a novel concept. Long live the PFL.
|
|